honoluluadvertiser.com

Sponsored by:

Comment, blog & share photos

Log in | Become a member
The Honolulu Advertiser

Archive for May, 2008

Quick Hits

Friday, May 30th, 2008


Late again! Good day, dear readers. Here are today’s hits (though abbreviated and, in honor of Sex and the City, sort of shallow):

•NBC is giving away free buttons to help viewers show their support for their favorite shows.

Here’s an early trailer for the Coen Brothers’ new flick, Burn After Reading.

•The wonderfully hilarious Harvey Korman passed away.

•Angelina Jolie DIDN’T have twin girls.

•What exactly is going on between John Mayer and Pete Wentz? Anyone?

Harrison Ford says there’s no chance of Hans Solo making a comeback, but Jack Ryan might do OK as a 66-year-old hero.

The New York Times calls the Sex and the City “vulgar, shrill and deeply shallow.” Umm, didn’t they watch the series?

Indy Schmindy

Friday, May 30th, 2008


So I know it’s kind of late in the week to be bringing this up, but I did battle the weekend crowds Sunday to watch the new Indiana Jones movie. Was I as disappointed as some people were? No. Did I love it? No.

You should see it if… 1. You’re a pop culture devotee and not seeing it would make you feel like you were missing out. (I’m in this category.)
2. Not-so-special effects don’t hinder you from getting into the story.
3. Lame surprises don’t disappoint you.

Don’t see it if…
1. You’re really excited about it and you’ve never learned to deal with minor disappointment.
2. You’re one of those people who waits for the DVD. Don’t make an exception this time. Wait for the DVD.
3. You think $10 is a lot of money to spend on two hours of entertainment. (But just so you know: It isn’t.)

Would I see it again?
Yes. If I would be allowed to comment on it out loud like I do with So You Think You Can Dance.

Should there be a sequel?
That’s what got us into this mess in the first place.

Is there something better out there right now?
Yes. Iron Man.

What did you guys think of the movie?

Quick Hits

Thursday, May 29th, 2008


Good … afternoon! Whoa. Time flies. Her are today’s hits:

•Chef Anthony Bourdain explains why Dale was kicked off Top Chef instead of, say, the less talented and oh-so-unlovable Lisa or the annoying Spike.

Entertainment Weekly has a list of the best Lost moments of season four.

•Bono’s a Japanese lawyer? Wha…?!

•Christian Dior dropped Sharon Stone from its advertising following her China remark. Bad karma, perhaps?

•Dunkin’ Donuts has pulled one of its ads that features Rachael Ray because in it, she’s wearing a scarf that looks like a kaffiyeh. Gasp! Not a fringed black and white scarf!? That’s what the bad guys like to wear! It’s all so ridiculous and frankly, I wish I hadn’t read the story because now I’m in a bad mood.

•George Clooney is … wait for it … single again! I’m in a much better mood.

•Clay Aiken is expecting a baby. Whoa. I knew he was gay, but I didn’t think he was actually a woman. Oh, wait. A woman is expecting his baby. That’s even more shocking. Oh, wait. It was artificial insemination. Now it’s just weird.

•David Cook broke a record that was previously held by Miley Cyrus. Woo. Hoo. Seriously though: Good for him.

•They used to make sculptures from pork fat.

Here’s a photo series about how chickens form in their eggs. Breakfast!

•Need a novelty gift? This guy sells ghosts in bottles. How handy!

•According to the Star-Bulletin, the Cirque du Soleil is coming to town sometime in the fall.

Quick Hits

Wednesday, May 28th, 2008


Good morning! Is it Wednesday already? Long weekends confuse me. Here are today’s hits:

•Take The Hardest Lost Quiz Ever. My score: 77 out of 3,900. Yeah. That’s like an F minus. Good luck.

Patrick Swayze says he’s responding well to cancer treatment.

• Oprah’s popularity is down. It’s about time. If only Tyra Banks’ popularity would follow suit…

•Showtime has finally posted this season’s premiere of “This American Life.” The posted ep is the moving and charming story of a disabled man and his caretaker mother. Dreamy Johnny Depp narrates. Take a break and watch it. It’s really worth it.

Some say music can alter the taste of wine. (Thanks to XLG for the tip!)

•The current issue of Inked has a feature on Hawai’i tattoo artists.

•Authors James H. Gilmore and B. Joseph Pine II tell us what post-modern consumerists really want in their new book Authenticity.

•A Margaret Thatcher-inspired teapot sold for £82 on EBay.

Here’s a cool feature that ran in Modern Mechanix in 1931, which depicts a future New York City circa 1980. The future city was envisioned and built using miniature models.

•A group whose members claim to be “electro-sensitives” want wi-fi banned in public areas because they say it makes them sick. I could go on and on about this breed of paranoid human, but I’ll just move on.

Bands are conceding that pulling off environmentally friendly tours is nearly impossible.

Sharon Stone’s Karma Problem

Tuesday, May 27th, 2008


This could get ugly, but I’m going to open the can anyway. Because when there’s a chance to take a pop culture discussion to a deeper level, we should take it! If only to test whether my critical thinking skills are still in tact.

Sharon Stone made this comment at the Cannes Film Festival about the recent China quake:

I’m not happy about the way the Chinese are treating the Tibetans because I don’t think anyone should be unkind to anyone else. And then this earthquake and all this stuff happened, and then I thought, is that karma? When you’re not nice that the bad things happen to you?

My question is this: If that same statement had been made by a religious leader who used the word “God” (or any translation thereof) instead of “karma,” would people (besides the Chinese) be more upset about it? It has happened time and again that religious leaders have attributed tragedy (from 9-11 to hurricane Katrina) to God — tragedy is God’s way of showing humanity that it’s doing something very wrong. Is it less offensive if karma is blamed for killing hoards of innocent people than if God were the culprit? If yes, then why?

My take on it is this: When it comes to matters of such overwhelming and inexplicable tragedy, we should just keep our blame theories to ourselves. Unless, of course, there really is someone to blame, in which case, we should blame the perpetrator. Al Qaeda? Yeah, blame those guys for 9-11. Hurricane Katrina? Myanmar cyclone? China earthquake? Let’s attribute those to a fickle and unforgiving Mother Nature, and remember that people are in deep, inconsolable pain. Telling them that some higher power — whether it’s God or karma — is punishing them by killing their loved ones is abhorrent.

I too think the Tibetans have suffered — and continue to suffer — immensely at the hands of a corrupt Chinese government. I just don’t think the children and the families of the children who lay crushed under the tons of rubble and debris should be made into sacrifices, payable to karma, on behalf of their government’s bad behavior. And even if it turns out that that’s what they are (on some esoteric level), let’s not tell them. They’ve been through enough.

Any thoughts? I know this is a severe divergence from our usual pop candy fare, but a good discussion can’t hurt, right?